The Old Ones

Jacques Kallis' hair

Jacques Kallis: His talent has not receded.

At the end of 2011, much of the talk in cricket was over what Australia, South Africa, and India should do about their aging titans. Should Ricky Ponting and Michael Hussey (Australia) gracefully leave the stage? Were Jacques Kallis’s days as South Africa’s leading batsman and great all-rounder over? How would India replace its superstar triumvirate of Rahul Dravid, Sachin Tendulkar, and V.V.S. Laxman?

At least in the case of two of the sides the answer has become clear in the New Year: No. After a string of failures, Ricky Ponting scored his 40th Test century (134), even though he almost ran himself out on 99. Michael Hussey showed his true consistency and grit with an imperious 150 not out in a record stand of 334 with Michael Clarke. In Cape Town, Kallis followed a pair (two innings in the same game where the batsman scores zippo runs) with a magisterial 234, his highest Test innings and his 41st century. His hair may have been transplanted, but Kallis below the fringe remains firmly rooted in the South African side.

India’s situation is more complicated. Rahul Dravid, aged nearly 39 years old, had his best year ever in 2011, and his stability is much in demand. Sachin Tendulkar, also nearly 39, has not been his old self, but he has gone through troughs in his two-decades-long career before and come back even stronger. V. V. S. Laxman, a year younger, has pulled India out of so many crises before that it would be tough to drop him, although his record of late has not been good.

England, by contrast, find themselves in the enviable position of their oldest batsman being only 34. A young side, they possess talent in depth that could keep them at the top of the Test rankings for four or five years—unless, that is, Australia (forced to rebuild following their debacle this time last year against the Poms) find a more successful way to integrate young blood with the old timers who can still turn on the magic.

Posted in Australia, Cricket, England, India, South Africa, Test Cricket | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Declaration

Eden Gardens, Kolkata

Eden Gardens, Kolkata: Where miracles happen

The Test match (the international version of the five-day game of cricket) offers a fascinating, strategic option for captains: the declaration. As Ron Kaplan notes of India’s current game against Australia : “Isn’t there the chance that India could have come up big and taken the match, or were their players that inferior? There’s a difference between running up the score and being aggressive in the pursuit of victory.” Well, the match isn’t over, but Ron’s question and points are very suggestive. Thus this blog.

In this game, India batted first and scored 191 runs. Australia then batted and racked up an enormous 659 for the loss of only four wickets before the Australian captain Michael Clarke felt that his side had scored enough runs (and he still had enough time—a full two days) to take ten more Indian wickets and win the game. And not just win the game, but do so without having to bat again! When they began their second (and final) innings, India were 468 runs behind the Australians. Even if the Indians managed to score 500 runs, Australia would still need only thirty-odd runs to win the game—assuming there was enough time in the match. So, Clarke’s team are currently in a very strong position.  As it turns out, at the end of the third day India are 114 for 2 wickets in their second innings, still 354 runs behind. It will take a feat of extraordinary discipline and resilience for the Indians to avoid losing eight wickets or score enough runs or take so long doing it that Australia cannot force a victory.

For Graeme Smith, the South African captain, the situation is even rosier. The South African side scored 580 for 4 wickets in their first innings before Smith declared. The total wasn’t an overwhelming one, but Smith took a risk and calculated that he had enough runs (and good enough bowlers) to put the Sri Lankans immediately under pressure. He was right. Sri Lanka scored only 239 in their first innings, leaving them adrift by 341 runs. If a side is over 200 runs behind the other following the completion of both side’s first innings, then the team that batted first has the option of “enforcing the follow on.” Smith did this. He effectively told the Sri Lankans, “We don’t think you’ll be able to make 341 runs in your second innings. Why should we bat again, when we can beat you by an innings?” Currently, at the end of the third day’s play in Cape Town, Sri Lanka is a dismal 138 for the loss of four wickets, still 203 runs behind making South Africa bat again. Smith’s bet looks like a good one.

Now, as Ron Kaplan has surmised, declarations can go spectacularly wrong—as can enforcing the follow on. In 1984, the England captain David Gower declared his team’s second innings with nine wickets down, setting the West Indies a formidable 344 runs to win in only one day. He guessed that the West Indies would go for victory and in doing so play risky shots and lose. He miscalculated spectacularly. He was correct in thinking the West Indies team would play their shots—but they played them brilliantly!  The West Indies romped to victory for the loss of only 9 wickets and with plenty of time to spare, causing huge embarrassment to the English. In Eden Gardens, Kolkata in March 2001, Steve Waugh‘s Australian team amassed 445 in their first innings and bowled out the Indian team for 212. Waugh asked the Indians to follow on, and the team promptly compiled an enormous 657 for 7, and then declared. The Australians were then bowled out for 171 in their second innings, which meant the Indians won by 171 runs. Waugh’s over-confidence had backfired: he should have decided not to enforce the follow on and batted India out of the game.

Such a result is very rare. Eden Gardens was only the third time in Test history that a team had won after following on, and it hasn’t happened since. In short, both Clarke and Smith can be fairly confident that they have their victories sewn up. But, this is cricket, and the unpredictable could happen: after all, Sachin Tendulkar is 8 not out overnight. Is he due for a match-saving double hundred?

Posted in Australia, Cricket, England, India, Sri Lanka, Test Cricket, West Indies | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Explaining Cricket Stats: Part Five

We have now reached the end of our forced march through the quagmire of (some) cricket statistics. For your sanity, we would strongly advise you to read parts One, Two, Three, and Four. We were inspired, if that is the word, to write these blogs by our friend Ron Kaplan, who is keen to watch a cricket game on television without scratching his head in mystification at the digits appearing at the bottom of the screen (as if he were in The Matrix). As ever, we want to assure you, gentle reader, that you can enjoy both baseball and cricket without having to know the intricacies of the figures you see displayed on the screen (or board, if you’re at the game). But, since we’ve made it this far, let’s move onto the final slide.

Cricket Game Screen Shot

Australia are now coming toward the end of their innings. The Second Powerplay was the last powerplay taken, and that’s over. During this over (the 42nd), the Australians have scored a run, lost a wicket, and not scored: the first three balls. Their run-rate (the average number of runs they’re scoring per over) is anemic. Zaheer Khan is bowling and David Hussey is the batsman who’s facing (“on strike” doesn’t mean he’s taking industrial action!). Judging by the screen shot, Hussey has just guided the ball behind him and the batsmen have crossed for a run. But the ball has sped away to the edge of the playing area (called the “boundary), which means that David Hussey will automatically be assigned four runs.

You’ll notice that, as with baseball, the edge of the ground is festooned with advertising. You’ll also see that, unlike baseball, cricket has no problem “decorating” the actual hallowed turf with advertisements, especially ones that are elongated so that perspectively they’ll “pop” for the television viewers.  If you look closely enough, you’ll see little white dots on the playing area. This is the “circle” within which some of the fielders have to stand during the powerplays. Given its location, however, the circle looks  as though it’s from an earlier game, because it doesn’t encompass the pitch (the brown turfed area).

Posted in Australia, Cricket, India, One-Day Cricket | Tagged | Leave a comment

Explaining Cricket Stats: Part Four

This is the penultimate entry in our tour through the labyrinth of cricket statistics: parts One, Two, and Three should be read in advance. So, slide four, please.

Cricket Screen Shot

By this time, you should know that Australia, who are batting, have scored 110 runs and have lost two wickets. It’s the end of the Second Powerplay. Now, let us look at the ODI (one-day international) career of Australian captain, Michael Clarke, whose stats are on the screen. He has batted 178 times (innings) and has amassed 6153 runs. If you divide the number of runs he’s scored by the number of times he’s lost his wicket (a fancy way of getting out), you arrive at his average, 44.59, which reveals him to be world-class in the one-day format of the game. In effect, each time he arrives at bat he scores nearly 45 runs.  In baseball parlance, he’s batting .351.

Unlike five-day cricket (or Test cricket, as it’s called when nations play one another) one-day games restrict the number of balls that any batsman can face, simply because the game is fixed at 300 legal deliveries per side. As you might imagine, how quickly you score runs is important. Michael Clarke’s strike rate is a respectable 78 runs per 100 balls. (Remember, in cricket you don’t have to run each time you hit the ball.) In the course of his one-day career, he has scored between 50 and 99 runs in an innings 47 times, and has scored over 100 runs (a century) on five occasions, with a best score of 130. All in all, you’re seeing a very, very classy player.

Just how classy is he? Well, as we write these words, Michael Clarke has just scored a humungous 329 not out against the Indians in the Second Test Match at Sydney. Unlike in the ODI game featured above, also against the Indians, Michael Clarke didn’t have to worry about strike rate or facing a limited number of balls. He could just bat and bat and bat—grinding the Indian team into dust (along with Ricky Ponting, who scored 134, and Michael Hussey, who scored 150 without being dismissed). Clarke’s is the 14th highest innings score in a Test match ever, and he could have continued: he was only 71 more runs from the highest total. But he decided his team had scored enough runs to beat the Indians without even having to bat again, so as the captain he decided to “declare.” It was more important to give his team as much time to take the remaining ten Indian wickets to win the game than to reach such a milestone. As we say, a very, very classy player.

Posted in Australia, Cricket, India, One-Day Cricket | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments

Explaining Cricket Stats: Part Three

We’re half way through our odyssey of describing the ins and outs of (some) cricket statistics, especially as they pertain to the one-day game. You are strongly advised to read parts One and Two before going any further, otherwise you will be as lost as a blind man at a semaphore convention. Slide three, please.

Cricket Match Still Shot

Finally, the Indians have taken an Australian wicket—off what appears to be the last ball of the tenth over. Shane Watson was bowled (“b”) by Ashwin—the guy looking to our right—for 25 runs in 38 balls: slow going on Watson’s behalf. What does it mean to be bowled? It means that Watson’s wicket was hit by the ball, dislodging the bails from the stumps (I told you you needed to go back to Part One!). The line through the P1 tells the viewer that the first Powerplay is over, which means that fielding restrictions will be lifted, unless the batting team opts to exercise the second Powerplay (there are currently three Powerplays per game, the second and third only lasting five overs each). Yeah, it’s complicated—so much so that even cricket commentators get a little fuzzy about what’s permitted by which team.

One little comment? I (Martin) love that the batsman is noted as being “dismissed.” It gives you something of the hauteur that can characterize the noble game. I think we should use the word in baseball. Next time A-Rod swings and misses for the fourth time, just turn to your fellow fan and comment, in your most clipped accent: “A-Rod wasn’t struck out. He was dismissed.”

Posted in Australia, Cricket, India, One-Day Cricket | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

Explaining Cricket Stats: Part Two

As we noted in Explaining Cricket Stats: Part One, you can easily get lost in the thicket of statistics in either sport. (“You is feeling like you was lost in the bush, boy?” as James Joyce tries to calm his readers in Finnegans Wake.) Much better to take yourself to a game, or watch it on television, and let either sport work their magic on your imaginations. But, assuming you’ve got a rough idea of what’s going on in Part One, let’s move on to another screen capture. Slide two, please.

Cricket Match Still Shot

We’re now a little further on in the game. (Read Part One for essential details.) This is the tenth over, and it’s the six ball. So far, the Australians have only scored one run in it (on the third ball), which tells me they’re making very heavy weather of the first Powerplay (which is just about to end). Shane Watson, who’s facing, has scored 25 runs from 37 balls and Brad Haddin 14 from 22. Now, we’re not getting any information about the bowler’s stats here. As we said in Part One, one-day games restrict each bowler to only 10 overs (or 60 legal balls). But the captain of the fielding team (he’s the one who directs the plays in cricket, and not the manager) can switch his bowlers around. Nor do they have to bowl all 10 allotted overs. You can bring them on and take them off with the kind of freedom that baseball managers would die for. By the way, since we’re getting technical here, you should know that the Indian fielder standing by the catcher is in the fielding position called the “slip.” He’s there to catch the ball on the fly, if it comes off the batsman’s bat or glove. And, yes, there is no such thing as foul territory in cricket: you can hit the ball anywhere, and you can be caught anywhere.

Posted in Australia, Cricket, India | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Explaining Cricket Stats: Part One

As we note in Right Off the Bat, cricket buffs and baseball fans share a love of statistics, and both games are replete in a range of stats. As we also note in the book, the fans of either sport can too easily get caught up in trying to understand the arcana of the other game and miss the deeper rhythms and commonalities between both games. In Right Off the Bat, therefore, we steered clear of trying to explain all the fielding positions or the mysteries of the scoreboard in cricket and didn’t mention such ticklish endeavors as the 1-6-4-3 double play (The batted ball has caromed off some part of the pitcher’s body to the shortstop, who feeds the ball to the second baseman who, in one motion, steps on second base and slings the ball to the first baseman, whose foot is on that base for the second force: all runners out!) or niceties of the adjusted pitching runs in baseball. We’ll leave that for this website, we said, and we will now be true to our word—at least about cricket.

Our friend Ron Kaplan sent us a number of still shots from a cricket game and asked us to decipher the numbers at the bottom of the screen. Over the course of the next five blogs, we’ll endeavor to go as deep as we can into this material without causing you to run out of oxygen and drown. So, slide one please.

Still Shot of Cricket Match

Three important rules to remember about cricket, baseball fans:

1. You don’t have to run if you hit the ball.
2. When you score you stay on the field and continue to bat until you are out.
3. You only get one or two chances to bat—in the whole match—depending on the type of cricket game being played. Thus, it’s easy to score lots of runs in cricket if you bat; but if you’re out, you play no part in any more hitting. Yeah, it’s tough.

This is a One-Day International (ODI) game between India (in the blue) and Australia (in the yellow), staged in India in 2011 as part of the 2011 World Cup. The umpire is in red. As you can see the bowler is running toward a brown piece of dirt, which is called the pitch. One Australian batsman is standing, waiting to receive the ball, in front of what’s called the wicket, which consists of three upright pieces of wood, or stumps, on which are two smaller pieces of wood, called bails. The batsman’s aim is to defend his wicket, and the bowler’s aim is to break the stumps or have the ball caught on the fly from the batsman’s bat, among other ways of getting the batsman out. Anyway, as you can see, there are two batsmen in the frame. When the batsman facing the bowler hits the ball and decides (remember, in cricket you don’t have to run if you hit the ball) to run, both batsmen set off—each running to the other’s end. That’s a run. If they think they can get cross over and get to the crease (that is the white marking—like the batter’s box—at either end of the pitch) before the ball is fielded and the stumps at either end broken by the throw, that’s another run.

Now, a word about the game that’s being played. An ODI is the international form of what is also called a one-day game, which, as the name suggests, lasts one day, or about seven or eight hours. Each side gets 300 legal balls in which to score as many runs as possible. In cricket, a member of the fielding team is chosen to bowl the ball (the equivalent of pitching). You can’t bring on a specially designated bowler (or batsman for that matter). They must all be part of the team. The bowler delivers six balls from one end of the pitch, which constitutes what’s called an over. Then another member of the team delivers six balls from the other end. In one-day cricket, no member of the team can bowl more than 10 overs (or 60 balls) each, which means that each team must contain at least five bowlers (out of eleven players, one of whom is the wicketkeeper—or catcher. You can see the wicketkeeper crouched behind the wicket.).

So, what’s happening in this shot? Well, Shane Watson and Brad Haddin (who’s facing—you can tell by the asterisk next to his name) have scored between them 26 runs. It’s early in the Australian innings—in one-day cricket you only ever get one chance at bat, or innings—and no wickets have fallen (the “0” following the 26). This is the fourth ball of the seventh over (6.3 overs have been bowled) out of 50, and the Australians have made a relatively slow start. The run rate (4.0 per over) is determined by the number of runs divided by the number of legal balls delivered. Watson has scored 18 runs in 23 balls and Haddin has scored 7 in 16 balls.

Now, what’s that “P1” all about? Well, this is where it gets a little tricky. Some years ago, the world cricketing authorities, who are always mucking about with the game, decided that too many one-day games had boring sessions where the batsmen were just pushing the ball around and scoring runs here and there and there wasn’t much excitement. I liken it to those parts of a basketball game where each team scores two points and you go back and forth up and down the court, until the final stages when you’re trying to score against the clock. Well, in cricket, it was as if everyone in the crowd was waiting for the final two or three overs when, in a mad dash to score runs (or to beat the other team’s runs), batsmen would hit big shots and wickets would fall. So, how to make the 46 overs before the final four overs of each innings exciting?

The authorities came up with what they call “Powerplays.” These are when fielding restrictions are put in place, which means that the fielding team (which normally can put fielders wherever it wants) can only place a certain number of players in the outfield to stop the batsmen hitting big shots. It’s as if in baseball, for the first three innings, you could only have the center fielder in the outfield and your left- and right- fielder had to join the others in the infield. It would encourage batters to swing for the fences, right? Well, that’s the idea here. This is Powerplay 1, which takes place over the first 10 overs of each innings. The number of fielders in the outfield has been restricted to four, which means that Haddin and Watson should be trying to lift the ball over the infield. Judging by the paucity of runs, they’re not doing a very good job.

Posted in Australia, Cricket, India | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

Ron Kaplan’s Review of Right Off the Bat

For your interest: the main complaint, the book isn’t long enough. That’s why we have this website!

Posted in Right Off the Bat Book | Leave a comment

Alex Rodriguez Gets Platelets’ Injection in Germany

How does Alex Rodriguez view Alex Rodriguez?

Yahoo sports is reporting a form of therapy for aging slugger Alex Rodriguez that is meant to extend his career. This treatment, a procedure recently performed in Germany, is considered by the New York Yankees to be in line with the stricter “ingestion rules” coming from the recent Major League Baseball labor agreement. Needless to say, whenever fans hear “injection” they largely remain skeptical. Controversy always seems to swirl around A-Rod.

Posted in Baseball, Yankees | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Top Ten Baseball Stories in 2011

The top baseball (and cricket) story of 2011....

Here comes my (Evander’s, admittedly subjective) Top Ten Baseball Stories and News in 2011.

10. Moneyball is released to theaters on September 23

9. Derek Jeter reaches 3,000 career hits, and Jim Thome reaches 600 career home runs

8. Albert Pujols signs with the 2012 Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim

7. Mariano Rivera sets the record for most saves in a career

6. Barry Bonds avoids Federal indictment and prison time

5. More Wild Cards are added and the Houston Astros will move to the American League

4. The Boston Red Sox collapse, Terry Francona exits, Bobby Valentine enters

3. Major League Baseball reaches a labor agreement thro 2016

2. The Saint Louis Cardinals win an eleventh championship in franchise history

…with drum roll, rim-shots, and whatever other appropriate family values noises, the number-one baseball story in 2011 (I warned you this is a subjective list)…

1. Right Off the Bat is published, by Paul Dry Books, on July 12, 2011.

And here’s to a Healthy, Peaceful, and Joyous New Year for all our faithful followers. Cheers!

Posted in Baseball, Right Off the Bat Book | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments