Baseball Date: July 11, 1914

Sure, you recognize this southpaw—here ca. 1919. He debuted for Boston five years earlier 100 years ago this past Friday.

Sure, you recognize this southpaw—here ca. 1919. He debuted for Boston 5 years earlier, which would be 100 years ago this past Friday.

While most of the West is meditating on the centennial of World War I, I (Evander) have been preoccupied with the upcoming centennial (2015) of W. C. Fields’s entry into the film world. But more relevant than both anniversaries to our project at Right off the Bat, this delightful article by Chris Dufresne, which describes (among its other virtues) the July 11, 1914, debut of a pitcher not long out of reform school, who would turn not only baseball but a fair chunk of the Western Hemisphere on its head. Certainly the sports world. How true: When Babe Ruth died a mere thirty-four years later (August 16, the date Elvis left the building for good twenty-nine years following), the lights assuredly did go out.

Posted in Baseball, Right Off the Bat Book | Tagged , | Leave a comment

21st-c. Ball and the Fans

Will sports' machinery more-closely conform to gray matter in the future?

Will sports’ machinery and technology more closely conform to gray matter in the future?

Is “the umpire blind”? Herewith the first important reviewable play in 21st-c. MLB, which means in the history of North American baseball and possibly anywhere. The video—available as part of the above link describing the game between two of the most-venerable franchises, the Pittsburgh Pirates and San Francisco Giants—decided the contest.

Sleight-of-hand may be quicker than the eye—but is the camera? You decide.

As pure technology has not yet taken over—when the numbers are crunched by machines, but the interpretation remains human—one may note a potential overuse in 2014 of what back in the day was called “The Overshift” or “Boudreau Shift”—in our time shortened to The Shift. We talk about the shift, as a defensive tactic, a little in Right off the Bat, as it applied to (opposing) manager Lou Boudreau and Ted Williams. (The tactic probably dates to the days of maniacal uber-strategist John McGraw, if not earlier.)

To date in 2014, evermore-extreme versions of the shift have proved effective in reducing offense.

Question: What other 21st-c. (or ever?!) sports’ management actually seeks to inhibit the fun-for-the-fans aspect of scoring—particularly if such offense is not HGH-related?

Reviewable replays are as likely as not to promote run-production: that is, if one were only able to see and think between the frames. The process also acutely slows down the game-experience for fans of an already-slowish-paced sport. Of course you could bundle all of this (il)logic, and tell it to Armando Galarraga and umpire Jim Joyce.

Gee whiz! 21st-century baseball: a head-scratcher for sure.

Posted in Baseball, Right Off the Bat Book, Right Off the Bat Website | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

ROTB at the Louisville Slugger Museum

ROTB_screenshotNathan Stalvy, curator of the Louisville Slugger Museum (maker of the bats for MLB), loves our book!

 

Posted in Baseball, Miscellaneous | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Going Multipurpose

Artist's rendition of Yankee Stadium in 2015, set up for soccer

Artist’s rendition of Yankee Stadium in 2015: set up for soccer

Silly me. I (Evander) thought that the point of the third-generation baseball stadium, with all those great sight lines, was baseball only. How wrong. Whenever money’s involved….

The 2009-occupied Yankee Stadium will host what most of the human race calls football till an adjoining stadium (land from one of the lesser-used garages) is constructed.

Thus, this so-called baseball-only Stadium will now include college football, ice hockey, and, during the season, field-chewing, whatever-happens-to-the-pitching-mound soccer.

When I toured the Stadium in January 2013, several “field-cops” literally screamed at anyone unintentionally sliding a toe from the warning track onto a (partially snow-encrusted no less) blade of infield grass.

Where’s a field-cop when you need one?

Posted in Baseball, Right Off the Bat Website, Stadiums, Yankees | Tagged | Leave a comment

Cricket to Baseball to Cricket

I (Evander) am not sure how instructive this one-minute time-lapse video is, as officials prepared Down Under (Sydney Cricket Ground) for the 2014 opening day of Major League Baseball. But one does get a relative sense of distance (the boundary, then the construction of baseball warning tracks possibly of clay [:05], infield [:06 ff.—dirt and definitely clay, layered], walls, and foul poles) as well as proportions relative and relevant to cricket and baseball.

Incidentally, one could make a few observations regarding the way one of these sports (baseball) is played on the major-leagues level and what about it appeals most to fans in order to maximize interest and attendance.

Generally, the baseball field conforms to the shape of the infield diamond. But many baseball fields are asymmetrical in the outfield. There are outfield nooks and crannies; walls are of varying heights, even within the same stadium. Cricket grounds are symmetrical—and the boundary is without the dimension of height variance.

In today’s third-generation baseball-only stadium, the stands hug the field along the foul lines. “Loud” foul balls are rarely caught. Advantage: batter.

Thus, contra most present trends, the present setup is pitcher-friendly in the creation of much foul territory along the right-field line. (It is impossible to figure left field from this angle.)

Checking at the :35-mark following, one sees how little space there is behind the catcher, which could be quite dangerous in a number of ways, including close plays at home plate wherein a thrown ball offline might ricochet in weird ways. The general advantage returns to the batter, as few foul popups to the backstop would remain in play for easy outs.

Note how the pitch is covered and uncovered throughout the video. (In baseball, the infield is thus protected against the elements.) Even though this pitch is very much in-play for baseball, in short-center field, it must be protected and is in a location in which relatively little baseball-action would occur.

Again following from baseball, almost every spectator is far from the action, whereas the crowd would have far better cricket-play sight lines. Further, the third-generation baseball-only stadium features maybe forty percent field-level seats, fewer in the decks and a good number in bleachers or other outfield configurations. The stands leading to the outfield are at steeper angles and reset.

It’s not quite possible to find the location of the bullpens. (For cricket followers: This is where the pitchers warm up, especially relief pitchers preparing to enter the game at a manager’s behest. At least one animal-rights organization proposes a new, more-literal term for bullpen: “arm barn.”) In some stadiums, “the pens” are warm-up areas on the field, in deep foul territory. I suspect in the present arrangement (:30 ff.), they would be located between the center-field wall and the viewers’ stands.

Posted in Baseball, Cricket, Stadiums | Tagged , | 1 Comment

“Million Dollar Arm”

Last June, ROTB blogged on Rinku Singh (b. 8/8/88!) and Dinesh Patel.

Now, the film—from Disney. The Hollywood take, not the Bollywood version. (Though some would persuasively argue that the biggest-and-smartest money lay in cricket—the IPL—on the Indian subcontinent: not in MLB.)

If ever there were a movie, generally speaking, in the bi-sport spirit of ROTB, Million Dollar Arm promises to be it: a funfest—stereotypes notwithstanding.

Posted in Baseball, Cricket, IPL, Right Off the Bat Website | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Notes toward a Supreme Fiction: My Sport Could Beat up Your Sport

As this is the 500th blog generated by the Right Off the Bat project, in the spirit of collegial, international, and inter-sport collaboration, we thought we’d put our heads together (ouch) in doing some outside-the-box thinking . . . and mix a metaphor or two in the process.

Ten games into this MLB season (there are more than 150 regular-season games yet to go), Evander has observed a dominant aspect of the major-league game that is touched upon in Right Off the Bat at its alpha and omega.

The overshift, which Johnny Damon out-hustled and out-thought in the 2009 World Series by executing an ingenious, ultra-rare double-steal of bases, is described at the baseball-start of our book, and alluded to later, as a brilliant bit of gamesmanship: virtually defining heads-up play. Late in our book, the term “Sabermetrics” worms its way in. This is a term coined around the work of uber-statistician Bill James. Anyone who has seen “Moneyball,” understands the impact James’s spectral musings has had on the way baseball is understood and, more importantly, “strategized” and played.

Evander’s central observation is thus: many more managers and clubs are employing radical, Sabermetric-style defensive shifts in the field, depending on who is pitching to some degree and, especially, who is batting. E. has seen one overshift wherein the third baseman moves way out to short right field. Should a left-handed batter ground out to this “new position,” the official scoring still goes 5-3. Very weird.

Extreme defense does not work under two conditions: (1) as Johnny Damon adroitly proved (in other words, a fielder needs to stand at every base lest the baserunner “run amok” with double-steals); (2) batters begin to do what Mickey Mantle, the great power hitter and pull hitter did (become masters of the drag bunt and/or condition themselves to stroke the ball to the opposite field).

Baseball and its managers, especially in the US and Canada—being those most conservative, provincial, and ossified of sports and individuals—actually find themselves becoming far more fluid in the field. The third baseman is no longer at third base and so forth.

It is perhaps an irony that cricket (typically seen as a bastion of the hidebound and traditional) should find itself having to deal with rapid change, especially in the wake of Twenty20 cricket. Bowlers and batsmen have to adapt to rapidly changing situations, and fielders and their positions are required to be equally adept in their placement. The key word for cricketers is flexibility in the face of new shots, new kinds of deliveries, and new fielding positions.

Perhaps baseball could and should learn a few things from cricket after all!

Posted in Baseball, Cricket, Right Off the Bat Book, T20 Cricket | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

2014 Major League Predictions

Putting away the snow shovel and dusting off the crystal ball....

Putting away the snow shovel and dusting off the crystal ball….

In time-honored fashion, and this being the ROTB Project blog-number 499, here come my (Evander’s) guesses for the 2014 Major League Baseball season. (“Predictions” is such a silly word. Who could? Well, I! in this 2-year-old podcast.)

American League East: The Tampa Bay Rays and Baltimore Orioles will fight it out for the lead and second place. The New York Yankees, even with the offseason moves, are a year older and minus their top slugger, who serves a season-long suspension. The 2013 Champion Boston Red Sox will have problems of their own.

American League Central: I look for the Detroit Tigers; with the young, fast, and scientific Kansas City Royals in the mix. I’m afraid, even in this time of year, as hope springs eternal, the Cleveland Indians will take a step backward.

American League West: The Oakland Athletics still represent a breath of fresh air, and the Texas Rangers have a lot of talent in reserve. The Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim (I understand the “of Anaheim” is being dropped in yet another franchise-name change, even as hitting coach Don Baylor injured himself during the ceremonial first pitch of the season) still need to get it together.

National League East: The Washington Nationals ought to accomplish in 2014 what they did not in 2013. The Atlanta Braves are always tough in the regular season. The New York Mets are in a quasi-rebuilding mode, their best pitcher on the shelf (though possibly returning late in the season), and the Philadelphia Phillies are “a veteran bunch,” which means too old.

National League Central: The St. Louis Cardinals are possibly the strongest team of all on paper. The Pittsburgh Pirates can build on last season, and the Cincinnati Reds should continue making plenty of noise.

National League West: From here, the Los Angeles Dodgers stand out from the rest of the pack. The San Francisco Giants have great even-number seasons, so they ought to be watched. The Arizona Diamondbacks are in the race for sure, even as of this writing they are prematurely in last place (as the Dodgers reside in first).

Posted in Baseball, Right Off the Bat Podcasts, Yankees | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Brendon Goes Big

Brendon McCullum

Brendon McCullum: raising his game

New Zealand’s cricket side has always punched above its weight—putting in performances that belie its small population and lack of financial resources relative to Australia. It currently ranks a lowly eighth (out of ten) in the ICC World Test Rankings, and nobody gave it much hope against the Indians (ranked number two) when the latter visited Aotearoa for a two-match series.  They reckoned without Brendon McCullum.

McCullum is an exciting and attractive player—known for big shots and fast-scoring, and for being devil-may-care, even reckless, at the crease. However, quashing his natural instincts to hit the hide off every ball, he has so far amassed a ton of records in scoring 225 in the first Test match and 289 so far in the second. He is only a few runs away from being the first Kiwi to score more than 300 runs in an innings, he has become only the second New Zealand batsmen to hit three double-hundreds, and in this latest knock he’s batted longer than any previous New Zealand batsman in an innings.

All this took place with New Zealand behind a whole pool table of 8-balls. Having been bundled out for 192 in the first innings, the Kiwis were helpless as India amassed 438 in their first innings, and took five New Zealand second-inning wickets to leave New Zealand effectively six runs ahead with only five wickets remaining. India must have fancied their chances of squaring the series, but McCullum and B. J. Watling (124) added a record 354 runs for the sixth wicket (a world record), and McCullum and Jimmy Neesham (67 not out) piled on another 125, to leave New Zealand 325 runs ahead, and in a much healthier situation.

I (Martin), for one, would be thrilled for McCullum to uncork some of his magic-in-a-bottle fireworks on the final day of the Test, set India a competitive total, and allow his bowlers to do the rest. Somehow, India—extraordinarily talented, yet infuriatingly complacent and conservative as they have been in this series—need to be woken up. And lowly New Zealand might be just the side to do it!

Posted in Cricket, India, New Zealand, Test Cricket | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Let’s Talk about Kevin

Kevin Pietersen

We need to talk about Kevin

One of the many consequences of England’s collapse to the Australians this winter has been the enforced retirement for playing for England of Kevin Pietersen, one of the most successful England batsmen ever. He’s only 33, has three, perhaps four, more years left at the top of his game, and wanted to continue in the England team. Apparently, however, the England team—or at least the captain and the management—didn’t want him in it. The decision by the bosses to tell KP that he’s no longer going to be considered for the squad for any version of the game—T20, one-day, or Test—has had commentators, ex-players, and the general public up in arms: How can England omit their most charismatic and destructive, and arguably best player?

The answer is murky (each side in the fracas has signed a non-disclosure agreement) but it looks as though the banners of KP feel he wasn’t a team player: he was arrogant, destructive of a team ethic, disloyal even, a destabilizing influence in the dressing room. So what? say KP’s defenders. You have to deal with mavericks, game-changers. It’s a failure of management and not Pietersen’s fault.

I (Martin) look at Pietersen much in the same way as I do Andrew Flintoff and Ian Botham: both of whom were similarly charismatic and crowd-favorite entertainers. When they were good, were very, very good, but when they were not—which was, toward the end, more often than not—they seemed to suck the life out of the team. Flintoff, especially: when he played, England lost, in spite of his heroics; when he was injured, England won, without him. As we’ve seen with Mitchell Johnson, a cricket side’s fortunes can be transformed by one member working at the height or his or her powers. Yet isn’t it better if ten + one members of a side are performing at their best?

England are at a very low ebb, yet they still contain some very good players. We will see this summer whether Pietersen’s absence matters or not. My bet is that it won’t. I’m not crying for him: He stands to make millions of dollars from the Indian Premier League, which begins in a few weeks.

Posted in Australia, Cricket, England, IPL, One-Day Cricket, T20 Cricket, Test Cricket | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment