Broken Bat

The real Cochise: He didn't worry about broken bats so much as broken arrows.

There once was a TV show called Broken Arrow, and I believe it was on the ABC network (when stuff like The Big Three Networks mattered to the Mad Men of the Nielsen ratings). Today, players and even fans need to concern themselves with broken bats. But according to engineer Dave Kretchmann and yahoo sports, the problem is not so serious as it once was. “A tree died for this?” you may ask. In college, certainly, aluminum bats are standard. The ping off aluminum is not particularly inspiring. But, being ecologically minded (especially having worked with Martin Rowe) I can see the advantages. Remember Roger Clemens of the Yankees viciously chucking a sharp bat fragment at a bewildered Mike Piazza of the Mets in the 2000 World Series? I am in favor of any change that makes for a safer stadium experience.

Posted in Baseball, Yankees | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Liberation Bibliography

Free us from the printer! Order in advance from our publisher, Paul Dry Books.

Help liberate our book from the printer and order Right Off the Bat . When will you become part of the solution and not part of the problem? Today! Now! In advance of publication, only here, straight from the Paul Dry website.

Posted in Right Off the Bat Book | Leave a comment

The Self-Evident Sexiness of Cricket

Lord Hawke

Lord Hawke: Victorian heart-throb

According to the actor Hugh Grant in the Financial Times, “Women do love a cricketer. It’s one of those things. It’s like Aston Martins.” As the article writer, George Parker, notes, the idea might strike some as absurd—even though Martin’s (no relation to the car) less attractive birth-twin (same day, same year, same country) and former Grant-flame Elizabeth Hurley is currently enjoying the googlies and wrong ‘uns of Australian great and bon viveur Shane Warne. However, as a rule, cricketers aren’t necessarily great athletes and the game is not fast-moving (like soccer or Formula 1 racing). Nor does it require a classic physique (like swimming) or muscle (like rugby).

My theory is that what it lacks in obvious vavoom, it more than makes up for in the language of love—or at least an argot suggestive of fun times between the sheets. Where else do you get a chance to stroke or caress a ball through the covers, and handle an offbreak by gently tickling it past the slips? How can you not love a game that, even though it’s filled with swingers and pullers and hookers, nevertheless allows anyone with a steady arm and subtle fingers to bowl a maiden over?

Of course, to our baseball cousins—drawn to the more immediate pleasure offered by a slider from the mound touching the outside corner or the exquisite frustration presented by striking out with two out, three on, and A-Rod on deck—the jouissance of cricket may seem at once esoteric and unnecessarily deferred. Ah, but isn’t that the delight of a game that can last five days? Why foul off or struggle to get to first base (whether on an error or not) when you can with minimal effort enjoy the seduction of a brand-new cherry kissing the edge of the willow or relish a long hop hoisted over deep backward square? What sport! my friends. What sport!

Posted in Baseball, Cricket | Tagged | Leave a comment

Sellout!

Because we (Evander and Martin) are publishers, we’ve a fairly skeptical outlook on the benefits of publicity on sales. For instance, we had a wonderful time at BookExpo America (BEA) signing free, publicity copies of Right Off the Bat, knowing full well that come the following day or week some of those copies would end up being sold on Amazon. We had, of course, hoped that the folks attending BEA might read the book and then pass it on to a friend—with, perhaps, a word or two in its favor to generate the buzz necessary to sell copies. But we doubt it, somehow. Still, should you wish to buy the book before it’s even available, you can now do so at Amazon—and it may even have our signatures in it!

Posted in Right Off the Bat Book | Leave a comment

Fan Clubs, Eastern and Western

Cal Koonce

Right now, if you live in India or the West Indies, you can share the joy and passion of Cricket by joining TheCricFanClub. On their website, you can even relive the T20 World Cup 2010 or replay England versus Zimbabwe, 2010….But if you are a baseball fan in Chicago, and want to relive the 1964 Cubs season via pitchers Cal Koonce or Dick Ellsworth, you might recall these fan-club lyrics that teenagers (and those a little younger) serenaded them with from the right-field bleachers!

“Dick Ellsworth Fan Club Song”
(to the tune of “God Save the Queen”)

Dick Ellsworth never balks,
Nor does he give up walks.
That’s why we shout!
Land where our southpaw throws,
From where each batter knows
Once Dick lets go of the ball
Tha-at he’ll . . . strike . . . out.

“Cal Koonce Fan Club Song”
(To the tune of “When Johnny Comes Marching Home Again”)

Hey, Cal! Come on and pitch the ball!
Hoorah! Hoorah!
O curve it so the strikeouts fall!
Hoorah! Hoorah!
Remember you’re on the pitcher’s mound
So listen close to the cheering sound
Of the grandstand mob who’s waiting to see the sprawl!
Of the grandstand mob who’s waiting to see the sprawl!

From East to West and back again, it’s beautiful music: here you can even sing along with Ola Ola Olay, the cheering song for Sri Lanka in the World Cup.

Posted in Baseball, Cricket, Sri Lanka | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Right Off the Bat at Forbes.com

We’re featured today in the “Bury the Lead” blog by Richard Hyfler at Forbes.com. So far, the comments on the blog have plunged into the murky origins of both games—something that we tried mightily to avoid in Right Off the Bat. Why do fans of both games insist on making their respective sports so impossible for non-fans to appreciate through obscurantism and arcana?

Posted in Right Off the Bat Book | Leave a comment

Talk and Book Signing 7/7 @ 7, BookCourt in Brooklyn

We will be talking baseball and cricket, and signing copies on 7/7 at 7!

Martin and I will be discussing the great national (and international!) pastimes of cricket and baseball on 7/7 @7 (in ’11!) and signing copies of Right Off the Bat at BookCourt, 163 Court Street, Brooklyn, New York 11201-6263, in beautiful Cobble Hill. The telephone for further information (should any be needed) is 718-875-3677. Step up to the plate and don’t knock over the wicketkeeper: There will be plenty of copies of our book available. Buy two! One to keep and one to give as the perfect gift for any fan of either or even neither sport.

Posted in Baseball, Cricket, Right Off the Bat Book | Leave a comment

What’s the Immigrants’ Game, Then?

Norman Tebbit

Norman Tebbit: Would you pass his test?

A story in the New York Times today discusses the role that cricket is playing in cohering South Asian immigrants who live in Rome. Cricket, according to the piece, is one of Italy’s fastest growing sports, and much more popular among South Asians than soccer. The story puts us in mind of one of the themes of Right Off the Bat, which is that, for all of baseball’s and cricket’s histories as sports that represent the quintessence of respectively American-ness and Englishness (meaning, in effect, “whiteness”), not only have the games been the pathway for people of color to become “acceptable” to the majority (i.e., white) society, but that they’ve also become the repositories for ethnic communities’ self-identity in their new countries.

Here lies the tension: Cricket and baseball offer minorities a way to immersion in the larger society, and yet they run the risk of isolating and ghetto-izing those same communities. During the 1980s, Norman Tebbit, a minister in Margaret Thatcher’s government, notoriously suggested that people of South Asian descent who lived in England should be tested on their allegiance to their host country by whether they supported the English cricket team, or whichever side from Pakistan, India, or Sri Lanka was visiting. Tebbit’s particularly blunt and racially tinged question—filled with the anxieties over what these “others” were thinking and doing in the midst of Little England—was roundly criticized, but it nonetheless touched a deep chord. You can probably guess what Tebbit considered the “correct” answer.

Wherever you fall in the “cricket test”—and when England played the U.S. in last year’s World Cup soccer tournament, Martin’s allegiances were sorely tested—Tebbit’s question offers a fascinating glimpse into the anxieties and opportunities that have been channeled through baseball and cricket throughout their history. In our opinion, it’s what makes these sports so rich beyond the playing of the games themselves, and one of the many fascinating threads that tie them together.

Posted in Cricket, Right Off the Bat Book | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

That’s Entertainment?

Jonathan Trott

jonathan Trott: Magnificent dullness

Let’s be honest: cricket and baseball are, in the end, about entertainment—about showing the paying customers a good time. A recent book (The House That Ruth Built: A New Stadium, the First Yankees Championship, and the Redemption of 1923 by Robert Weintraub) argues that Babe Ruth changed the so-called percentage game that had dominated up to that point—all stolen bases, runs batted in, and what was known as Scientific Baseball—by championing the home run and celebrating the man who did it: the slugger. The crowd loved it; the purists hated it; but thanks to the Sultan of Swat, baseball—on its death bed after the “Black Sox Scandal“—survived, revived, and thrived.

Cricket faces a similar dilemma. Test cricket—the purist’s game of strategy and technical brilliance, of mental toughness and the intense application of supreme concentration—is under threat of extinction. Nobody’s coming to see it. What they’re turning up in droves to watch, however, is Twenty20—the brash slugfest that champions towering drives into the stands and dancing girls, colorful costumes, and thudding music.

Encapsulating the dilemma, one might say, is Jonathan Trott. In the recent game against Sri Lanka, he scored a mammoth 203 runs. In only 19 matches he has amassed 1803 runs at an average of 66.77, which is second only to the legendary Don Bradman. Now, I don’t know anything about Jonathan Trott’s character. He may, as far as I know, be a delightful companion, hilarious and subtle of wit, and the life and soul of the party. But as a batsman, he is relentless, remorseless, emotionless; a machine that compiles the runs with little showmanship or even sense of the crowd around him. He almost literally digs himself into the trenches and awaits whatever the opposition bombard them with, until he has worn them down. The crowd often feels the same way.

So, if you’re attempting to revitalize Test cricket, what do you do? Trott is a phenomenal player; he has all the qualities one would want in a professional. His discipline, mental fortitude, and skill and execution constitute one reason why England’s team continues to ascend the world rankings. But he’s not good box office; he’s no Babe Ruth. We don’t pretend to have the answer, but we’ll continue to discuss the conundrum and tell you what develops.

Posted in Baseball, Cricket | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The Great Cricket Heist

Chris Tremlett

Christ Tremlett: Destroyer

To some of our readers (you know who you are), cricket—no matter our protestations to the contrary—is a boring game. A snooze. A snorefest. Those who happened to catch the first four and a half days of the just-concluded first Test match between England and Sri Lanka in Cardiff, Wales, would be inclined to agree. Since the game was played in May, rain was always a possibility, and no fewer than 139 overs (that’s 834 balls or pitches to baseball fans) were lost because of the miserable conditions. When play was possible, Sri Lanka (with minimal fuss) reached 400 in their first innings, while England (with minimal flare) amassed a total of 496 for the loss of five wickets before declaring. That that declaration happened at about 3:15 p.m. on the fifth and final day of the game, with only a few hundred fans still in attendance (it had rained all morning) only seemed to confirm that this game was, in more ways than one, a washout.

However, the reason why (Test) cricket—pace the critics—is such a wonderful pastime is that, as that sage Yogi Berra once said of the game’s noble sister, “It ain’t over till it’s over.” In the small matter of just over an hour and a half, England skittled out Sri Lanka’s batsmen for only 82, thus winning by an innings and 14 runs.  Nobody, not even the English players themselves, could quite believe it. Sri Lanka were shellshocked. Certainly, the media were astonished, and the few fans who’d sat in the cold drizzle throughout much of the match suddenly found their patience (if not stubbornness) rewarded as they witnessed a result that will go down in history as one of the more extraordinary.

It’s as if you’d been watching the Mets at the Rangers (say, an interleague affair) reach 2–2 at the bottom of seventh inning, before the heavens opened and it poured for six hours. Everything told you to go home, get some rest, forget about the result; that in the great scheme of things it was just one game among many. But you’re the kind of fan for whom it’s never just one game. So you stuck around and contemplated the Arlington (Tex.) puddles. Then at three a.m., with more people on the field than in the stands, the Mets came out and slammed 14 runs in the final two innings. Yes, what happened in Cardiff was that unlikely.

Of course, there’ll be those who’ll say that two hours of breathtaking, heart-stirring brilliance cannot compensate for days of drenched dullness—and I can see what they mean. However, consider for a moment the possibility that if it wasn’t for the sogginess, the very unlikelihood of a result, then England wouldn’t have blasted victory from the rock face of a draw. England never doubted that it was possible (however unlikely) that they might win; Sri Lanka never considered the possibility (however unlikely) that they might need to steel themselves against a possible defeat. When Sri Lanka started losing wickets, they hadn’t done the mental preparation. The rain had lulled them to sleep.

England and Sri Lanka play in a few days time at Lord’s, home of cricket. It’s a good bet that Sri Lanka will be a mental mess, whereas England (so often on the receiving end of psychological meltdowns) will be on fire. Bring on the rain, I say.

Posted in Cricket, England, Sri Lanka, Test Cricket | Tagged | 1 Comment